|
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-april-2023
Nadomešča:
SIST-TP CEN/TR 14383-2:2008
Preprečevanje kriminala z načrtovanjem stavb, urbanističnim načrtovanjem in
vzdrževanjem mesta - 2. del: Načela in postopek
Crime prevention through building design, urban planning and city maintenance - Part 2:
Principles and process
Kriminalprävention im öffentlichen Raum, in Gebäuden und in Anlagen durch
Gebäudeplanung, Städtebau und Instandhaltung - Teil 2: Grundsätze und Verfahren
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TS 14383-2:2022
ICS:
13.310 Varstvo pred kriminalom Protection against crime
91.020 Prostorsko planiranje. Physical planning. Town
Urbanizem planning
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
CEN/TS 14383-2
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
December 2022
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
ICS 13.310; 91.020; 91.120.99 Supersedes CEN/TR 14383-2:2007
English Version
Crime prevention through building design, urban planning
and city maintenance - Part 2: Principles and process
Kriminalprävention im öffentlichen Raum, in Gebäuden
und in Anlagen durch Gebäudeplanung, Städtebau und
Instandhaltung - Teil 2: Grundsätze und Verfahren
This Technical Specification (CEN/TS) was approved by CEN on 14 November 2022 for provisional application.
The period of validity of this CEN/TS is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to
submit their comments, particularly on the question whether the CEN/TS can be converted into a European Standard.
CEN members are required to announce the existence of this CEN/TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the CEN/TS
available promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in
parallel to the CEN/TS) until the final decision about the possible conversion of the CEN/TS into an EN is reached.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2022 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TS 14383-2:2022 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword . 5
Introduction . 6
1 Scope . 7
2 Normative references . 7
3 Terms and definitions . 7
4 General approach . 8
4.1 CPTED as risk management for the prevention/reduction of crime problems . 8
4.2 Assumptions of this document . 9
4.3 Content and process . 10
4.4 Focus on urban environments . 10
5 Principles of CPTED. 11
5.1 General. 11
5.2 CPTED: how to implement it and what to do. 11
5.2.1 General. 11
5.2.2 General principles on how to implement CPTED . 11
5.2.3 Principles on what to do to tackle and reduce crime problems [2] . 14
6 Framework (Responsible Body: leadership and commitment) . 15
6.1 General. 15
6.2 Responsible Body (RB) . 15
6.2.1 General. 15
6.2.2 Policy commitment . 15
6.2.3 Improvement . 15
6.2.4 Evaluation . 16
6.3 Making specific CPTED processes possible . 16
7 Specific CPTED process in one project/environment . 18
7.1 General. 18
7.2 Working Group . 20
7.2.1 General. 20
7.2.2 Two approaches: integrated or specialized . 20
7.2.3 Document identifying the Working Group programme . 20
7.3 Communication and consultation Responsible Body <-> Working Group . 21
7.3.1 General. 21
7.3.2 Working Group responsibilities . 21
7.3.3 Responsible Body decides . 21
7.4 Scope, context and criteria . 22
7.4.1 Specific Crime Prevention Statement (SCPS) . 22
7.4.2 Objectives/requirements. 22
7.5 Crime risk assessment and review . 22
7.5.1 General. 22
7.5.2 Crime risk identification . 23
7.5.3 Three categories of crime problems . 23
7.5.4 Crime risk analysis: where, what and who . 24
7.5.5 Crime risk evaluation (ex ante) . 27
7.6 Monitoring (during) and evaluating (afterwards) . 27
7.6.1 General . 27
7.6.2 Ex post evaluation to learn . 28
7.7 Recording and reporting . 29
8 Examples for the application of risk management of crime problems . 29
8.1 Levels at which action can be taken . 29
Annex A (informative) Crime classification and further information . 34
A.1 Crime: how to classify 11 specific types in 24 languages . 34
A.1.1 Crime? . 34
A.1.2 International Classification of Crime. 34
A.1.3 European Classification of Crime . 35
A.1.4 How to use this information for your own practical purposes? . 37
A.1.5 Further information on data and mapping . 37
Annex B (informative) Crime Assessment (new environment) – Examples of elements to take
into account . 40
B.1 Introduction . 40
B.2 Risk assessment: three general aspects . 40
B.3 Specific risk assessment factors for types of crime and for feelings of insecurity . 41
Annex C (informative) Crime review – Problem identification in existing environments . 45
Annex D (informative) Level of intervention and CPTED strategies . 47
D.1 Strategies . 47
D.1.1 General . 47
D.1.2 Urban planning strategies . 47
D.1.3 Urban design strategies . 48
D.1.4 Management strategies . 48
D.1.5 How to choose appropriate strategies . 49
Annex E (informative) Feelings of insecurity . 50
E.1 Introduction . 50
E.2 Factors which characterize an “unsafe location”: . 50
E.2.1 Fear generating activities . 50
E.2.2 Vandalism and poor maintenance . 50
E.3 Problematic urban design . 51
E.3.1 General . 51
E.3.2 Lack of control . 51
E.3.3 Isolation – lack of visibility by others . 51
E.3.4 Lack of orientation and alternative routes . 51
Annex F (informative) Security framework of an urban project [2] . 52
F.1 The basic principles . 52
F.2 Urban planning strategies . 53
F.2.1 Taking into account the existing social and physical structures . 53
F.2.2 Guarantee
...