The natural dialectical view considers that conservation is essentially a specific relationship between the transformation of things. When one type of material movement is transformed into another type of material movement, it must proceed according to the inverse change relationship, that is, there must be two opposite changes at the same time during the transformation . If there is a gain, there will be. loss, if there is increase, there will be decrease, and if there is union, there will be There is division, there is advancement and withdrawal, there is newness and there is old age, there is life and there is death, etc. and there is a certain constant quantitative relationship between them.
Thinking carefully about this theorem, I think it has two meanings:
The first meaning is the transformation of the movement of one type of material to the movement of another material type; It is not just the movement of a single substance. In other words,we cannot stick to the material movement itself. We must consider this change as a whole in order to discover the correctness of this theorem. Otherwise, we can't find out. For example, in wind power generation, wind energy is converted into electrical energy and the energy in it remains unchanged even if there is no wind power production, wind power can always be converted into another energy, like waves blowing on the ground; waves of sea and wheat blowing in the wheat fields. Wind energy is converted into wave or wheat wave potential energy; when wind blows over exposed rocks, wind energy is converted into heat generated by friction between air and wheat; rocks ; when the wind blows, the friction of the air itself also generates heat; the strong wind blows hard. Sound is wind energy converted into sound energye. The above energy transformations take place at the same time, and it is difficult to distinguish them in detail. However, it is certain that from the moment the wind blows until it gradually disappears, all its wind energy is converted into other energy. . Therefore, any kind of material movement is accompanied by a transformation of movement, and movement without transformation is impossible.
The second meaning is that the movement of matter is immutable. This point is difficult to understand. Some comrades may consider this matter from the perspective of table tennis. They ask themselves: who said that the movement of matter was immutable? This table tennis ball is hit here and there, flying here and there, isn't it changing? How can we say that it is immutable?
The natural dialectical view believes that conservation is essentially a specific relationship in transformationn things. When one type of material movement transforms into another type of material movement, it must proceed according to the relationship of inverse change, i.e. transformation. There must be two opposite changes at the same time, there must be have gains and losses, there must be increases and decreases, there must be divisions and divisions, there must be advances and retreats, there must be old and new, there must be there must be life and death, etc., and there is a certain constant quantitative relationship between them.
After carefully considering this theorem, I think it has two meanings:
The first meaning comes from a certain The movement of a substance is transformed into the movement of another substance, not just the movement of a single substance. In other words, we cannot stick to the movement of the substance itself. We must consider this change as. a tout to discover the correctness of this property of the theorem, otherwise it would not be discovered. For example, in wind power generation, wind energy is converted into electrical energy, and the energy contained in it remains unchanged even if there is no wind; power generation, wind energy can always be converted into other energy, like waves blowing on the sea, blowing in the wheat field.Wheat waves, wind energy is converted into waves or wave potential energy wheat; when wind blows over exposed rocks, wind energy is converted into heat generated by friction between the air and the stones; when the wind blows, the friction of the air; itself will also generate heat; strong winds roar. The sound of ground blowing is wind energy converted into sound energy. The above energy transformations are carried out at the same time, and it is difficult to separate theming in detail. However, from the time the wind blows until it gradually disappears, all of its wind energy is converted into other energy. Therefore, any type of material movement is accompanied by a transformation of movement, and movement without transformation is. impossible.
The second meaning is that the movement of matter is impossible. This point is difficult to understand. Some classmates may consider this question from the perspective of playing table tennis. the movement of matter is immutable? This table tennis ball, hit it here, hit it here, fly here, fly there, isn't it just changing?
Hope? to adopt