Is NTU's lack of merger a reflection of its strength? My impression is that my NTU classmates told me that NTU once wanted to merge with Nanjing Medical College, but failed, and merged with NTU, but failed. He had even tried to merge with Nanqi Medical College, but failed. Is this a sign of strength? It's simply because the merger failed! If you don't succeed, you don't succeed. If you don't succeed, you must act as if your strength is incredible. This is false. (I will not remind the interlocutor how the merger of Nanjing Medical University failed. The interlocutor should know better than an outsider like me)
What is the resumption of diplomatic relations after the merger of Shanghai and Nanjing Medical? Isn't the university, which was slightly stronger, necessarily better than Nanda? Shanghai's strength is much better than thatfrom Nanjing, it is not at all at the same level. No matter how much Zhihu boasts, Nanjing is almost the same as Shanghai. Where does the interrogator's confidence come from? After the merger, it will be better than NTU overall. How about removing these really unpopular majors from NTU and then comparing? Take out a group of Earth scientists in astronomy, atmosphere, ocean, geology and geography to see how strong they are? How many NTUs are better than Zhejiang University?
It's a fact that NTU doesn't play miniskirts, but it's worth discussing whether they can't or won't do it. In my opinion, Nanjing University can be said to be a set of unpopular majors. What if we also packed a miniskirt together? Are astronomy, atmosphere, ocean, geology, geography, library information grouped togetheres and approved in advance? The rest is based on electronics, computer science, mathematics, physics and chemistry. Can China's history, business and social sciences hold up?
Who told the person who asked the question that when evaluating a university you should only consider scientific research? Have you ever realized how many politicians the University of Tokyo has trained in Japan? In particular, do you know how many people with degrees in economics and law from the University of Tokyo are involved in politics? Scientific research is only an indicator, and employment is also an indicator. Let's see how Silicon Valley started? There is no shame in finding a job, starting a business and making money. Everything is substandard except for scientific research. I wonder how Nantah University subjected the subject to a wash of thisrveau.
I have seen others compare Qingbei University and Dongda. University abroad, I don't think that's what the interrogator said. Japanese universities began to develop earlier than those in China. After having accumulated history, they still enjoy a certain reputation in the eyes of white people. The ranking of Chinese universities has only increased in recent years, and their real strength should be ignored. In the eyes of outsiders, it is normal that they don't understand many aspects. Just like you know what are the good schools in Vietnam and Iran? I think most Chinese people don't know this.
As for the academicians of Nanjing University, thanks to the merger of Jinling University after the Republic of China and the adjustment of departments, Nanjing University was indeed very strong at that time. But if we exclude the unpopular academicians in geosciences, the academiciansremaining micians from NTU are actually not much more numerous than those from other universities. The interrogator can count them himself. In addition to the talent gap, academicians are generally older. The geosciences of Fudan University of Science and Technology are not strong, the geosciences of Zhejiang University are basically shabby, and Jiaotong University seems to have none?
The school motto of Nanjing University is to be sincere, majestic, and encourage learning and practice. The question posed by the question only shows arrogance. Is the question worthy of your alma mater?