TEPCO uses nuclear wastewater to raise flounder. Does this really prove that nuclear wastewater is s

Tepco uses nuclear wastewater to raise flounder. Does this really prove that nuclear wastewater is safe? The occurrence of this situation does not prove that nuclear wastewater is safe. Why do you say that? Just because he's using this nuclear wastewater to raise this fish doesn't mean the nuclear wastewater is truly safe, because in many cases some fish are. able to adapt to this nuclear radiation, and nuclear radiation will not cause very serious consequences for a short time, so its approach cannot prove that nuclear wastewater is safe

Subtle< p>Because that this nuclear radiation is a subtle behavior, in our daily life, even if we use very dangerous nuclear wastewater, it will not have any impact on our body in a short time, it will explode after a certain level, causing serious very serious conditions in oure body. The approach fundamentally cannot prove that nuclear wastewater is safe. Only through various evidence can this finally be proven, and it cannot be proven by his approach at all.

Very dangerous

Because the impact of nuclear wastewater is very important. serious and very dangerous. If we really are, the use of nuclear wastewater is likely to affect the healthy growth of any of our bodies. The reason why he breeds fish is that there will be no problems in a short time, but what will happen. Does this happen after a year or two? Nobody knows what's going on, so his approach can't be proven safe at all.

In general, if you want to prove that nuclear wastewater is safe, you have to go through a lot of proof and the experimental report can finally prove that nuclear wastewater is safe. It is also very annoying andrequires many steps. What can ultimately be proven cannot be proven by breeding fish.